WEF - THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY : YOU OWN NOTHING AND RENT EVERYTHING
- WWHISPER
- Jul 27, 2022
- 5 min read
Updated: Dec 13, 2022
WEF continues to produce promo videos and written docs for its plan at a rapid pace. There is clearly pressure.
During the Covid debacle, Klaus Schwab and his vassals sang in chorus : " we have, a unique, narrow, window of opportunity for a great reset " and voilà, on 05.06.2020, WEF published a video about the launch of The Great Reset ostentatiously pressing the start button with the obligatory finger, just so the world would know they were about to start, and we knew it straight away. In July 2020, we were all subjected to a mouth mask obligation and ended up in a second full manipulated lockdown with curfew.
Rule number one to push a plan through: scare the population, push them into a fear psychosis, subject them to a series of freedom-restricting measures and condition them to obey submissively. This has partly succeeded. Some of the world's population still walks around with their bottoms pinched, but they already did so pre-Corona so the plan actually failed. The good news is that those who were asleep then are steadily waking up and " starting to see it". Difficult is not. The plan is out in the open. The sect is becoming increasingly trippy in its actions. They no longer hide anything. By the way, they never did but now they are saying it out loud. On camera for the whole world to know.
On 18.07.2022, the WEF published its umpteenth paper. This time it is about the circular economy. In itself, there are some good ideas in there but ... the way they want to tackle it doesn't make sense.
An analysis :
" We need a clean energy revolution, and we need it now. But this transition from fossil fuels to renewables will need large supplies of critical metals such as cobalt, lithium, nickel, to name a few. Shortages of these critical minerals could raise the costs of clean energy technologies. "
Mja, of course, that is what you get when you impose absurd sanctions on a country that is one of the largest exporters of that which you need to build " renewables ". That country then imposes counter-sanctions on the " unfriendly countries " and strengthens its ties with African countries where the soil is also full of necessary resources. The unipolar world is over. BRIC is expanding with numerous other countries and Africans are building an African union.
"Another solution commonly discussed is to recycle more and use the metals already in circulation. The complication is that we do not currently have enough metals in circulation, and even with recycling taken into consideration, mineral production is still forecast to increase by nearly 500%.
Yes. Recycling is certainly good but in order to recycle there must be enough critical raw materials in circulation and that is not the case. Klaus has well understood that this is not a viable option.
So how does he intend to solve the problem?
Go from owning to using Car sharing. Not buying one car with several and sharing it according to needs but ... rent a car from a company from the WEF stable. There are already several companies that rent cars ... per hour. How much those companies earn from hourly rentals and how deep we have to dip into our pockets to rent a car by the hour is totally irrelevant. The fact that this formula is not feasible for people living in the country ( ttz outside densely populated cities ) is also irrelevant.
Enable preference for longevity That's a great plan. In the not-so-distant past, you could hardly get electrical appliances to break down. A Miele washing machine was good for 40 years of use. But. the industry wanted to encourage us to buy so not only did they bring out an ever-increasing variety of products with new gadgets, but they also hid a counter in them that limited the lifespan of appliances sold and broke down after xtal uses or they put in a poor-quality part that broke down after 2-3 years (after the warranty period) and they also manufactured their appliances in such a way that repair was almost impossible. The device ended up in the scrap yard and people bought a new one at a democratic price. Prices have dropped over the years to encourage people to buy new.
A washing machine, refrigerator, TV is no longer made to last. Clothes, shoes and other gadgets even more so. Collections used to change seasonally. Since years, they change every month and even every week in some chains.
The government has been firmly instrumental in building a society entirely focused on consumption. With the introduction of the Euro standards, citizens and companies were and still are encouraged to buy a new car or light truck every 4-5 years. It is not done to keep driving the same vehicle for 10 years. Nowadays, they are betting everything on buying electric vehicles. Buy, buy, buy. And yes, even the smartphone industry slaps us around with a new model every few months. All advertising campaigns are aimed at buying. Belong. Don't be anti-social. Anyone still walking around with an Iphone 5 or God bet a 3 or 4 will be looked at smugly. You are only " in " if you have a 12 or 13.
Klaus now wants manufacturers to focus more on durability and longevity. Great idea but ... the industry will not go along with this. If they cannot sell their products with regularity, they will go out of business. Manufacturers, distributors, shops ... can only continue to exist precisely because they can persistently sell new products.
Build pride in second life This is another great idea that has not been thought through well enough. There are enough of them, I think. It costs loads of money to pay the thousands of people who sit in the think tanks. It is therefore very unfortunate that the result of their thinking is so limited.
Repairing defective goods and/or giving them a second life. Solar poles that have a longer lifespan ( now max 20 years ), increasing the lifespan of wind turbines by 20 years, extending the lifespan of electric batteries ... it all sounds like music to the ears but, even this is not feasible because all that stuff is made by manufacturers who want to keep selling and sustain themselves.
Klaus and co would do better to have a talk with the industry before presenting a plan to the world.
It would certainly not be wrong for them, all of them, to also delve a bit more into what exactly circular ( or recycling ) economics is and realise well that peoples will NOT give up their comfort ( car, electrical appliances, electronics ...). If industry stops producing in the absence of the required critical raw materials, people will continue to use the things they have until they fall apart and then still try to have them repaired for further use ( which is a good thing ). If the industry continues to produce and market new gadgets, they will continue to buy. Simple.
Klaus had it right when he talked about " a narrow window ". The window is indeed very narrow to push all his plans through. Too narrow. More than that, it has already blown shut against his mugshot, but he is so stunned that he did not feel the blow.
Comments