.When Anthony Fauci, who is considered a world authority on corona and vaccines, says in a November 2022 study - which he conducted together with 6 other authorities in the field - that all Covid and flu vaccines have failed, none of them are efficient and therefore formally contradict all other claims that have ever been made, what is the priority? His position or that of interest groups that claim that the vaccines are useful and continue to promote vaccination?
If a certain Bill Gates warmly recommends the mRNA vaccine for 2.5 years as the only remedy against corona, so as not to become infected, get sick and die, suddenly changes his mind and states that the vaccines are problematic, infection do not block, do not offer protection and also only work for a very short time on a specific variant, what is the most credible and who should we believe? Him or all the others who claim that the vaccine is useful and continue to promote vaccination?
If the head of BAYER's pharmaceutical department says that the mRNA vaccines are cell and gene therapy, but this has not been made known to the public because otherwise 95% of the population would not have taken the stuff, who are we to believe? ? Him or all the others who claim that it is not gene therapy but provide no evidence of this?
If 1 scientific study states that the vaccines do not cause cardiovascular disease and is not the cause of sudden heart failure and 100 other studies say that the vaccines do cause serious side effects including myocarditis, pericarditis and other cardiovascular diseases, which is the most credible? That 1 or that 100?
If EMA warns of serious side effects of myocarditis and pericarditis in its provisional conditional authorization for commercialization of Pfizer's mRNA vaccine of 21.12.2020 (and subsequently also Moderna), what is the most credible? The position of EMA or the position of those who claim that it is all nonsense and the vaccines are safe and effective, without providing any proof?
If Pfizer's internal documents show that it prepared a report on April 30, 2021 in which more than 420 serious side effects were registered and that between December 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021, 1,223 people died after vaccination and several tens of thousands of side effects of which more than 11,000 had not yet recovered by 30.04.2021; the same side effects also appear from the databases Vaers, Eudravigileance and VigiAccess that register side effects and vaccine damage AND from hundreds of studies that have investigated the side effects, which is the most credible? The data from the aforementioned official bodies and a multitude of researchers or the claims of other people and bodies who claim that there are virtually no side effects and vaccine damage and the vaccines are safe and effective?
Who or what should we believe?
Who or what do we WANT to believe?
Comments